Everyday AI — Can You Prove Your AI Is Governed? | Galtea
The EU AI Act requires proof of oversight, not good intentions. If you can't show your AI's decision trail, you're already non-compliant. The EU AI Act requires proof of oversight, not good intentions. If you can't show your AI's decision trail, you're already non-compliant. The EU AI Act requires proof of oversight, not good intentions. If you can't show your AI's decision trail, you're already non-compliant. The EU AI Act requires proof of oversight, not good intentions. If you can't show your AI's decision trail, you're already non-compliant. The EU AI Act requires proof of oversight, not good intentions. If you can't show your AI's decision trail, you're already non-compliant. The EU AI Act requires proof of oversight, not good intentions. If you can't show your AI's decision trail, you're already non-compliant.

Your employees are letting ChatGPT make decisions nobody's keeping a record of.

Your AI is making decisions you can't fully audit, and an incident could be just around the corner.

Most employees use AI tools ungoverned. It works until an audit asks for the paper trail.
This is what a random Thursday could look like for your compliance team:

09:14 AM

A team deploys a new AI feature without a documented risk assessment.

Missing required risk classification

10:22 AM

An AI-assisted hiring decision is made with no human sign-off logged.

No human oversight on record

11:05 AM

A vendor updates the model your product runs on, and nobody re-tests it.

Undocumented change to a high-risk system

11:45 AM

A customer asks how an AI decision about them was made, and no one can answer.

No audit trail to produce

12:05 PM

An incident happens, and there's no record of who was notified or when.

Missing incident report

All of this before lunch.

Now multiply it for every AI system, in every department, all year long

That's tens of thousands of untracked decisions, and one of them is the one an auditor asks about.

Number of employees
250
5,000+ Undocumented decisions / month See my compliance gap

And these gaps come with hefty fines

€35M or 7% of total turnover
Deploying high-risk AI without required conformity assessment or human oversight.
€15M or 3% of total turnover
Failing to maintain documentation, risk logs, or audit trails for high-risk systems.
€7.5M or 1% of total turnover
Failing to report incidents or provide requested records to regulators.

Replace hope with evidence using Galtea

1
Capture
Galtea captures every AI decision and interaction across your systems, automatically, with no extra process for teams.
2
Evaluate
Every captured decision is checked against your governance policy and the AI Act's requirements.
3
Report
A single audit-ready record of what your AI systems did, who reviewed it, and where the gaps are.

Start with a compliance gap check, it's free

No cost, no obligation. Fill this in and we'll show you exactly what you couldn't prove to a regulator today, and how to fix it.

Something went wrong. Please try again or email info@galtea.ai.

Thanks — we'll be in touch within one business day to schedule your consultation.

Trusted by teams governing AI at scale
ABANCA Telefónica Sabadell Zurich BSC Generalitat Adigital Hitz CEATIC CiTIUS
Trusted by teams governing AI at scale
Sabadell Zurich ABANCA Generalitat de Catalunya Telefónica Adigital CEATIC BSC CiTIUS HiTZ — EHU